Clival chordoma research
Home › Tissue and biopsy

Procedure risks and the cost of delay

(Agent report, 2026-09-03. Reviewed by Kya at synthesis.)

EEA biopsy-only series

Zhang 2023 (11): 10/11 dx, 1 epistaxis return to theatre. Liu&Di 2009 (10): 10/10, 1 ICA injury (balloon), 1 transient CSF leak. Kelley 1999 (7): 5/6, 1 CSF leak, 1 bleed. Graillon 2014 (3): 3/3, no complications, mean stay 4 d. Palejwala 2018 Meckel's cave (6): 6/6. Pooled ~37: non-dx ~9%, ICA 1/37, CSF leak 2/37, death 0.

EEA resection of clival chordoma — meta-analyses

Alternatives

Yield

~90-95% first attempt. Brachyury IHC works on small biopsies (Jambhekar 2010: 46/51 chordomas +, 0/58 non-chordoma).

Cost of delay

Liquid biopsy

None validated. Mattox 2021 ctDNA needed tissue WES first. Zuccato 2022 plasma methylome AUROC 0.84 (CI 0.52-1.00), research only. Gill 2020: "Obtaining a sample for pathological analysis is key for a final diagnosis and should be done prior to the initiation of treatment efforts".

Observation

No primary-chordoma guidance for observing a symptomatic lesion; only incidental non-enhancing BNCT-type lesions. Stanford: MRI usually sufficient to suspect → proceed to biopsy+resection same sitting (i.e. still tissue).

Research thread 03 · source file em-research/03-procedure-risks-cost-of-delay.md · last edited 03 September 2026