Clival chordoma research
Home › Units, surgeons and records

Choosing the centre

Prepared 4 September 2026 by Kya for her partner and the patient. It sets out the case both ways, what the evidence does and does not say, and the questions that should decide it. Evidence is in research thread 07. It is not a recommendation to delay; whichever unit, the priority is tissue.


What is settled

What the evidence does not say

Neither unit has published outcomes for skull base chordoma or chondrosarcoma. Both contribute anonymously to the same national datasets (the CRANIAL endonasal study; the national proton cohort). Inspection ratings do not separate them: both trusts are Requires Improvement overall with surgery rated Good. Annual skull base chordoma numbers for either unit could not be found. So "which is better" cannot be answered from published data. It can be answered by asking.

The one evidence-backed predictor of a complete removal in the UK is unit volume. In the national cohort (Glancz 2024, BMJ Oncology, 230 patients from 18 units), each extra case a unit sent for protons raised the odds of complete removal by about a third, and volume was the only significant factor. GIRFT 2018 recommends chordoma be concentrated in fewer, higher-volume centres for the same reason.

The case for Southampton

The case for Derriford

The questions that decide it

Ask both units, in writing if possible:

  1. How many skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas do you operate on each year?
  2. How many have you referred for proton beam therapy since 2017?
  3. Who would do the operation (neurosurgeon and ENT surgeon by name), and how many endoscopic endonasal skull base cases do they do a year?
  4. Will you refer her to the National Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma Skull Base MDT, and when?
  5. What is your earliest date for MDT discussion and for biopsy?

Choose on the answers to 1, 2 and 5. If Southampton's numbers are clearly higher and the delay is short, the choice is well founded. If the numbers are similar, or the transfer adds weeks while her eye signs progress, Derriford with a national MDT review is the safer path, and a Southampton second opinion can run alongside.

One line for the ward or the complaints team

"We would like the Derriford referral to proceed without delay, the case referred to the National Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma Skull Base MDT, and a parallel referral to Southampton under patient choice, with both units asked their annual skull base chordoma volume and earliest biopsy date so that the family can make an informed decision."

Sources

Brief for the family · source file em-docs/em-centre-choice.md · last edited 27 September 2026